The Hard Problem in AI Monetization Isn’t Billing. It’s Framing Value.

Sep 6, 2025

When people talk about AI monetization, the conversation often drifts to billing mechanics. Usage-based pricing, per-token charges, API call metering — these are important building blocks, but they are not the hard problem.

The real challenge is framing value clearly for customers and capturing a sustainable margin.

Lessons From Advertising

Advertising is one of the clearest examples of how a market matures. In its early days, ad spend was experimental and loosely tied to outcomes. Over time, the industry developed standardized ROI metrics such as impressions, clicks, conversions, and return on ad spend. These gave both buyers and sellers confidence.

This maturity allowed advertising to scale into one of the most profitable business models in history. Companies could price inventory reliably, advertisers could compare channels on equal footing, and the market as a whole moved past guesswork.

Why AI Is Different (and Harder)

AI today is where advertising was decades ago. It is experimental, frothy, and subsidized by investors. Most companies focus on covering infrastructure costs rather than measuring and charging for the full value delivered.

There are a few reasons why:

  • Value is harder to measure. A chatbot response does not have a universal metric like a click. Is the value in speed, accuracy, stickiness, or retention?

  • Customers expect efficiency and savings. In SaaS, value can be tied directly to headcount replacement or process automation. In AI, companies must prove the product is not just cheaper but also more effective than alternatives.

  • Margins compress quickly. Early entrants may enjoy high margins, but competition drives prices down. Without clear value metrics, differentiation is hard to sustain.

The Path Forward: Metrics That Matter

If AI is to reach advertising-level maturity, the industry needs standardized metrics that prove customer value. These could include:

  • Resolution rate: how often an AI delivers the correct or desired outcome

  • Time saved: efficiency gains relative to human or legacy workflows

  • Retention lift: whether AI features increase stickiness or reduce churn

  • Revenue impact: contribution to lead conversion, upsells, or expansion

Without these measures, pricing remains guesswork and margins remain fragile.

Experimentation Is the Bridge

In the absence of clear standards, experimentation is the most practical way forward. Companies can simulate willingness to pay, run A/B tests on usage tiers, and measure retention impacts under different pricing models.

It is messy and iterative, but it is how markets evolve. Just as advertising tested its way into clarity, AI monetization will require cycles of experimentation paired with emerging benchmarks.

The Bottom Line

Billing mechanics are solvable. What is not yet solved is how to translate AI’s impact into metrics that customers trust, and then charge in a way that reflects that value.

Advertising matured once it standardized ROI. AI will follow the same path, but only if the industry moves beyond billing details and focuses on building a shared language of value.

Tanso

© 2025 Tanso. All rights reserved.

The Hard Problem in AI Monetization Isn’t Billing. It’s Framing Value.

Sep 6, 2025

When people talk about AI monetization, the conversation often drifts to billing mechanics. Usage-based pricing, per-token charges, API call metering — these are important building blocks, but they are not the hard problem.

The real challenge is framing value clearly for customers and capturing a sustainable margin.

Lessons From Advertising

Advertising is one of the clearest examples of how a market matures. In its early days, ad spend was experimental and loosely tied to outcomes. Over time, the industry developed standardized ROI metrics such as impressions, clicks, conversions, and return on ad spend. These gave both buyers and sellers confidence.

This maturity allowed advertising to scale into one of the most profitable business models in history. Companies could price inventory reliably, advertisers could compare channels on equal footing, and the market as a whole moved past guesswork.

Why AI Is Different (and Harder)

AI today is where advertising was decades ago. It is experimental, frothy, and subsidized by investors. Most companies focus on covering infrastructure costs rather than measuring and charging for the full value delivered.

There are a few reasons why:

  • Value is harder to measure. A chatbot response does not have a universal metric like a click. Is the value in speed, accuracy, stickiness, or retention?

  • Customers expect efficiency and savings. In SaaS, value can be tied directly to headcount replacement or process automation. In AI, companies must prove the product is not just cheaper but also more effective than alternatives.

  • Margins compress quickly. Early entrants may enjoy high margins, but competition drives prices down. Without clear value metrics, differentiation is hard to sustain.

The Path Forward: Metrics That Matter

If AI is to reach advertising-level maturity, the industry needs standardized metrics that prove customer value. These could include:

  • Resolution rate: how often an AI delivers the correct or desired outcome

  • Time saved: efficiency gains relative to human or legacy workflows

  • Retention lift: whether AI features increase stickiness or reduce churn

  • Revenue impact: contribution to lead conversion, upsells, or expansion

Without these measures, pricing remains guesswork and margins remain fragile.

Experimentation Is the Bridge

In the absence of clear standards, experimentation is the most practical way forward. Companies can simulate willingness to pay, run A/B tests on usage tiers, and measure retention impacts under different pricing models.

It is messy and iterative, but it is how markets evolve. Just as advertising tested its way into clarity, AI monetization will require cycles of experimentation paired with emerging benchmarks.

The Bottom Line

Billing mechanics are solvable. What is not yet solved is how to translate AI’s impact into metrics that customers trust, and then charge in a way that reflects that value.

Advertising matured once it standardized ROI. AI will follow the same path, but only if the industry moves beyond billing details and focuses on building a shared language of value.

Tanso

© 2025 Tanso. All rights reserved.

Tanso

© 2025 Tanso. All rights reserved.

The Hard Problem in AI Monetization Isn’t Billing. It’s Framing Value.

Sep 6, 2025

When people talk about AI monetization, the conversation often drifts to billing mechanics. Usage-based pricing, per-token charges, API call metering — these are important building blocks, but they are not the hard problem.

The real challenge is framing value clearly for customers and capturing a sustainable margin.

Lessons From Advertising

Advertising is one of the clearest examples of how a market matures. In its early days, ad spend was experimental and loosely tied to outcomes. Over time, the industry developed standardized ROI metrics such as impressions, clicks, conversions, and return on ad spend. These gave both buyers and sellers confidence.

This maturity allowed advertising to scale into one of the most profitable business models in history. Companies could price inventory reliably, advertisers could compare channels on equal footing, and the market as a whole moved past guesswork.

Why AI Is Different (and Harder)

AI today is where advertising was decades ago. It is experimental, frothy, and subsidized by investors. Most companies focus on covering infrastructure costs rather than measuring and charging for the full value delivered.

There are a few reasons why:

  • Value is harder to measure. A chatbot response does not have a universal metric like a click. Is the value in speed, accuracy, stickiness, or retention?

  • Customers expect efficiency and savings. In SaaS, value can be tied directly to headcount replacement or process automation. In AI, companies must prove the product is not just cheaper but also more effective than alternatives.

  • Margins compress quickly. Early entrants may enjoy high margins, but competition drives prices down. Without clear value metrics, differentiation is hard to sustain.

The Path Forward: Metrics That Matter

If AI is to reach advertising-level maturity, the industry needs standardized metrics that prove customer value. These could include:

  • Resolution rate: how often an AI delivers the correct or desired outcome

  • Time saved: efficiency gains relative to human or legacy workflows

  • Retention lift: whether AI features increase stickiness or reduce churn

  • Revenue impact: contribution to lead conversion, upsells, or expansion

Without these measures, pricing remains guesswork and margins remain fragile.

Experimentation Is the Bridge

In the absence of clear standards, experimentation is the most practical way forward. Companies can simulate willingness to pay, run A/B tests on usage tiers, and measure retention impacts under different pricing models.

It is messy and iterative, but it is how markets evolve. Just as advertising tested its way into clarity, AI monetization will require cycles of experimentation paired with emerging benchmarks.

The Bottom Line

Billing mechanics are solvable. What is not yet solved is how to translate AI’s impact into metrics that customers trust, and then charge in a way that reflects that value.

Advertising matured once it standardized ROI. AI will follow the same path, but only if the industry moves beyond billing details and focuses on building a shared language of value.

Tanso

© 2025 Tanso. All rights reserved.

Tanso

© 2025 Tanso. All rights reserved.

Tanso

© 2025 Tanso. All rights reserved.