Add-Ons vs. Tiers: Packaging That Expands Revenue
Sep 4, 2025

Point of view: Make it easy to start and easy to grow. Tiers define the default path for each segment. Add-ons capture high-variance, high-value needs without forcing upgrades. This is a practical workflow: define tiers and add-ons, decide what goes where, design upgrade paths, and ship with rules customers can predict.
What tiers and add-ons are (and why they matter)
Tiers. Predefined bundles for distinct segments (for example, Starter, Growth, Enterprise). Each step increases capability, limits, and support.
Add-ons. Optional modules or capacity on top of a tier. Useful when a minority of customers value a capability much more than the median.
Why use both
Acquisition clarity: tiers reduce choice overload.
Expansion flexibility: add-ons let accounts grow spend without jumping a full tier.
Better willingness-to-pay capture: heavy users or specialized buyers can pay for what they uniquely value.
Roadmap signal: packaging pressure reveals which features are baseline versus premium.
Primer: OpenView on packaging and value metrics.
Pros and cons at a glance
Tiers
Pros
Simple buying experience
Clear segmentation and positioning
Built-in upgrade path
Easier competitive comparison
Cons
Rigid bundles can force “all or nothing” upgrades
Risk of over- or under-serving segments
Repackaging later can be disruptive
Reference layouts: Salesforce editions, Airtable plans
Add-ons
Pros
Precise monetization for polarized features
Incremental expansion without a tier jump
Lets different buyer personas participate (for example, IT funds a security add-on)
Good for variable costs or expensive capabilities (AI/compute, advanced analytics, premium support)
Cons
Can create decision complexity if there are too many
Risk of “nickel and diming” perception
Harder to compare against competitors that bundle generously
Tasteful examples: Notion AI, Figma Dev Mode
How add-ons drive expansion without forced upgrades
Bridge the gap. If Pro is $100 and Enterprise is $300, a $50 add-on for a single Enterprise feature can raise ARPU without a $200 jump.
Capacity relief. Offer usage packs when customers hit plan limits. Prevent churn at the ceiling and keep momentum until a full upgrade makes sense.
Lifecycle timing. Many premium needs appear after activation. Sell the core first, attach the add-on when the value is obvious.
Persona targeting. Some capabilities map to different budget owners. Keep them separate so the right team can fund them.
Cost alignment. If a feature has real variable cost, put it behind an add-on or usage pack to protect unit economics.
More on price architecture: Paddle/ProfitWell on feature packaging.
When tiers are better
Core value. Capabilities most customers need should live in tiers. Gate them by tier level, not as add-ons.
Simplicity as a moat. If your segment values speed and clarity, fewer choices convert better.
Enterprise procurement. Large buyers prefer complete bundles that check security, compliance, and support in one line item.
Positioning. Tiers communicate who the product is for. Use them to anchor your narrative and defend against comparison tables.
Playbook: combine tiers and add-ons for growth
A) Define tier “jobs” and guardrails
For each tier specify:
Target segment and outcomes
Core capabilities and limits tied to your value metric
Support and compliance expectations
List price range and typical approval path
Keep to two to four tiers. If you think you need five, consolidate.
B) Choose add-on candidates
Good add-ons are:
Polarized (some customers love it, many do not need it)
Expensive to provide (AI/compute, premium support, custom connectors)
Adopted later in the lifecycle
Owned by a different buyer (security, data governance)
Able to stand alone with a clear value story
Limit the catalog. Most customers should not need more than one add-on at purchase.
C) Set rules for what goes where
Core adoption drivers → tiers
Specialized power features → add-ons
Usage variability → credits and packs
High-touch service → enterprise tier or services SKU
D) Design upgrade paths you can explain in one sentence
“If you need SSO and audit logs, move to Business.”
“If you need deeper analytics, add the Analytics Pack on any plan.”
“If you exceed included credits, buy a pre-paid block at volume rates.”
E) Price with simple math and visible thresholds
Anchor add-ons at 20–60% of the associated tier price unless the value case stands alone.
Publish included allowances and overage rates.
Offer pre-paid blocks for predictability and discounts for commitments.
Keep round numbers buyers can remember.
Useful framing ideas: Nick Kolenda on pricing psychology.
F) Communicate outcomes, not parts
On the pricing page and in sales materials:
Describe what the customer can now do and which metric moves
Show who typically buys an add-on and when
Provide a one-screen calculator for capacity decisions
Inspiration: HubSpot ROI calculators
Examples
Collaboration SaaS. Three tiers by admin and security depth. Add-ons: advanced analytics, HIPAA pack, extra storage blocks. Outcome: clear entry path and multiple expansion levers.
AI help desk. Tiers include user seats and monthly inference credits. Add-ons: premium models, fine-tuning, white-glove support. Heavy accounts pre-buy inference blocks for predictable spend.
Data platform. Tiers align to governance and performance SLAs. Add-ons: private link, audit exports, dedicated compute. Enterprise bundles support and security to satisfy procurement.
Pitfalls to avoid
Too many add-ons. Decision fatigue hurts conversion. Curate the list.
Hiding essentials behind add-ons. Customers will view this as nickel and diming.
Mismatched upgrade economics. If Pro + add-on > Enterprise, buyers will stall.
Ambiguous limits. Publish allowances and overage math to avoid surprises.
No migration plan. Repackages happen. Grandfather cleanly and provide clear paths.
Implementation checklist
Tier “jobs” defined with outcomes, limits, support, and list price ranges
Add-on candidates pass the polarized or expensive test and are few in number
Clear rules for what is tiered, what is add-on, and what is usage-based
Visible allowances, overage rates, and pre-paid block pricing
Pricing page copy explains upgrade paths in one sentence each
Sales has a one-pager and a calculator for capacity and ROI
Migration and grandfathering policy documented before launch
Further reading
Packaging and value metrics: OpenView
Feature packaging and price architecture: Paddle/ProfitWell
Examples of tasteful add-ons: Notion AI, Figma Dev Mode
Reference plan layouts: Salesforce editions, Airtable plans
Tanso
© 2025 Tanso. All rights reserved.
Add-Ons vs. Tiers: Packaging That Expands Revenue
Sep 4, 2025


Point of view: Make it easy to start and easy to grow. Tiers define the default path for each segment. Add-ons capture high-variance, high-value needs without forcing upgrades. This is a practical workflow: define tiers and add-ons, decide what goes where, design upgrade paths, and ship with rules customers can predict.
What tiers and add-ons are (and why they matter)
Tiers. Predefined bundles for distinct segments (for example, Starter, Growth, Enterprise). Each step increases capability, limits, and support.
Add-ons. Optional modules or capacity on top of a tier. Useful when a minority of customers value a capability much more than the median.
Why use both
Acquisition clarity: tiers reduce choice overload.
Expansion flexibility: add-ons let accounts grow spend without jumping a full tier.
Better willingness-to-pay capture: heavy users or specialized buyers can pay for what they uniquely value.
Roadmap signal: packaging pressure reveals which features are baseline versus premium.
Primer: OpenView on packaging and value metrics.
Pros and cons at a glance
Tiers
Pros
Simple buying experience
Clear segmentation and positioning
Built-in upgrade path
Easier competitive comparison
Cons
Rigid bundles can force “all or nothing” upgrades
Risk of over- or under-serving segments
Repackaging later can be disruptive
Reference layouts: Salesforce editions, Airtable plans
Add-ons
Pros
Precise monetization for polarized features
Incremental expansion without a tier jump
Lets different buyer personas participate (for example, IT funds a security add-on)
Good for variable costs or expensive capabilities (AI/compute, advanced analytics, premium support)
Cons
Can create decision complexity if there are too many
Risk of “nickel and diming” perception
Harder to compare against competitors that bundle generously
Tasteful examples: Notion AI, Figma Dev Mode
How add-ons drive expansion without forced upgrades
Bridge the gap. If Pro is $100 and Enterprise is $300, a $50 add-on for a single Enterprise feature can raise ARPU without a $200 jump.
Capacity relief. Offer usage packs when customers hit plan limits. Prevent churn at the ceiling and keep momentum until a full upgrade makes sense.
Lifecycle timing. Many premium needs appear after activation. Sell the core first, attach the add-on when the value is obvious.
Persona targeting. Some capabilities map to different budget owners. Keep them separate so the right team can fund them.
Cost alignment. If a feature has real variable cost, put it behind an add-on or usage pack to protect unit economics.
More on price architecture: Paddle/ProfitWell on feature packaging.
When tiers are better
Core value. Capabilities most customers need should live in tiers. Gate them by tier level, not as add-ons.
Simplicity as a moat. If your segment values speed and clarity, fewer choices convert better.
Enterprise procurement. Large buyers prefer complete bundles that check security, compliance, and support in one line item.
Positioning. Tiers communicate who the product is for. Use them to anchor your narrative and defend against comparison tables.
Playbook: combine tiers and add-ons for growth
A) Define tier “jobs” and guardrails
For each tier specify:
Target segment and outcomes
Core capabilities and limits tied to your value metric
Support and compliance expectations
List price range and typical approval path
Keep to two to four tiers. If you think you need five, consolidate.
B) Choose add-on candidates
Good add-ons are:
Polarized (some customers love it, many do not need it)
Expensive to provide (AI/compute, premium support, custom connectors)
Adopted later in the lifecycle
Owned by a different buyer (security, data governance)
Able to stand alone with a clear value story
Limit the catalog. Most customers should not need more than one add-on at purchase.
C) Set rules for what goes where
Core adoption drivers → tiers
Specialized power features → add-ons
Usage variability → credits and packs
High-touch service → enterprise tier or services SKU
D) Design upgrade paths you can explain in one sentence
“If you need SSO and audit logs, move to Business.”
“If you need deeper analytics, add the Analytics Pack on any plan.”
“If you exceed included credits, buy a pre-paid block at volume rates.”
E) Price with simple math and visible thresholds
Anchor add-ons at 20–60% of the associated tier price unless the value case stands alone.
Publish included allowances and overage rates.
Offer pre-paid blocks for predictability and discounts for commitments.
Keep round numbers buyers can remember.
Useful framing ideas: Nick Kolenda on pricing psychology.
F) Communicate outcomes, not parts
On the pricing page and in sales materials:
Describe what the customer can now do and which metric moves
Show who typically buys an add-on and when
Provide a one-screen calculator for capacity decisions
Inspiration: HubSpot ROI calculators
Examples
Collaboration SaaS. Three tiers by admin and security depth. Add-ons: advanced analytics, HIPAA pack, extra storage blocks. Outcome: clear entry path and multiple expansion levers.
AI help desk. Tiers include user seats and monthly inference credits. Add-ons: premium models, fine-tuning, white-glove support. Heavy accounts pre-buy inference blocks for predictable spend.
Data platform. Tiers align to governance and performance SLAs. Add-ons: private link, audit exports, dedicated compute. Enterprise bundles support and security to satisfy procurement.
Pitfalls to avoid
Too many add-ons. Decision fatigue hurts conversion. Curate the list.
Hiding essentials behind add-ons. Customers will view this as nickel and diming.
Mismatched upgrade economics. If Pro + add-on > Enterprise, buyers will stall.
Ambiguous limits. Publish allowances and overage math to avoid surprises.
No migration plan. Repackages happen. Grandfather cleanly and provide clear paths.
Implementation checklist
Tier “jobs” defined with outcomes, limits, support, and list price ranges
Add-on candidates pass the polarized or expensive test and are few in number
Clear rules for what is tiered, what is add-on, and what is usage-based
Visible allowances, overage rates, and pre-paid block pricing
Pricing page copy explains upgrade paths in one sentence each
Sales has a one-pager and a calculator for capacity and ROI
Migration and grandfathering policy documented before launch
Further reading
Packaging and value metrics: OpenView
Feature packaging and price architecture: Paddle/ProfitWell
Examples of tasteful add-ons: Notion AI, Figma Dev Mode
Reference plan layouts: Salesforce editions, Airtable plans
Tanso
© 2025 Tanso. All rights reserved.
Tanso
© 2025 Tanso. All rights reserved.
Add-Ons vs. Tiers: Packaging That Expands Revenue
Sep 4, 2025



Point of view: Make it easy to start and easy to grow. Tiers define the default path for each segment. Add-ons capture high-variance, high-value needs without forcing upgrades. This is a practical workflow: define tiers and add-ons, decide what goes where, design upgrade paths, and ship with rules customers can predict.
What tiers and add-ons are (and why they matter)
Tiers. Predefined bundles for distinct segments (for example, Starter, Growth, Enterprise). Each step increases capability, limits, and support.
Add-ons. Optional modules or capacity on top of a tier. Useful when a minority of customers value a capability much more than the median.
Why use both
Acquisition clarity: tiers reduce choice overload.
Expansion flexibility: add-ons let accounts grow spend without jumping a full tier.
Better willingness-to-pay capture: heavy users or specialized buyers can pay for what they uniquely value.
Roadmap signal: packaging pressure reveals which features are baseline versus premium.
Primer: OpenView on packaging and value metrics.
Pros and cons at a glance
Tiers
Pros
Simple buying experience
Clear segmentation and positioning
Built-in upgrade path
Easier competitive comparison
Cons
Rigid bundles can force “all or nothing” upgrades
Risk of over- or under-serving segments
Repackaging later can be disruptive
Reference layouts: Salesforce editions, Airtable plans
Add-ons
Pros
Precise monetization for polarized features
Incremental expansion without a tier jump
Lets different buyer personas participate (for example, IT funds a security add-on)
Good for variable costs or expensive capabilities (AI/compute, advanced analytics, premium support)
Cons
Can create decision complexity if there are too many
Risk of “nickel and diming” perception
Harder to compare against competitors that bundle generously
Tasteful examples: Notion AI, Figma Dev Mode
How add-ons drive expansion without forced upgrades
Bridge the gap. If Pro is $100 and Enterprise is $300, a $50 add-on for a single Enterprise feature can raise ARPU without a $200 jump.
Capacity relief. Offer usage packs when customers hit plan limits. Prevent churn at the ceiling and keep momentum until a full upgrade makes sense.
Lifecycle timing. Many premium needs appear after activation. Sell the core first, attach the add-on when the value is obvious.
Persona targeting. Some capabilities map to different budget owners. Keep them separate so the right team can fund them.
Cost alignment. If a feature has real variable cost, put it behind an add-on or usage pack to protect unit economics.
More on price architecture: Paddle/ProfitWell on feature packaging.
When tiers are better
Core value. Capabilities most customers need should live in tiers. Gate them by tier level, not as add-ons.
Simplicity as a moat. If your segment values speed and clarity, fewer choices convert better.
Enterprise procurement. Large buyers prefer complete bundles that check security, compliance, and support in one line item.
Positioning. Tiers communicate who the product is for. Use them to anchor your narrative and defend against comparison tables.
Playbook: combine tiers and add-ons for growth
A) Define tier “jobs” and guardrails
For each tier specify:
Target segment and outcomes
Core capabilities and limits tied to your value metric
Support and compliance expectations
List price range and typical approval path
Keep to two to four tiers. If you think you need five, consolidate.
B) Choose add-on candidates
Good add-ons are:
Polarized (some customers love it, many do not need it)
Expensive to provide (AI/compute, premium support, custom connectors)
Adopted later in the lifecycle
Owned by a different buyer (security, data governance)
Able to stand alone with a clear value story
Limit the catalog. Most customers should not need more than one add-on at purchase.
C) Set rules for what goes where
Core adoption drivers → tiers
Specialized power features → add-ons
Usage variability → credits and packs
High-touch service → enterprise tier or services SKU
D) Design upgrade paths you can explain in one sentence
“If you need SSO and audit logs, move to Business.”
“If you need deeper analytics, add the Analytics Pack on any plan.”
“If you exceed included credits, buy a pre-paid block at volume rates.”
E) Price with simple math and visible thresholds
Anchor add-ons at 20–60% of the associated tier price unless the value case stands alone.
Publish included allowances and overage rates.
Offer pre-paid blocks for predictability and discounts for commitments.
Keep round numbers buyers can remember.
Useful framing ideas: Nick Kolenda on pricing psychology.
F) Communicate outcomes, not parts
On the pricing page and in sales materials:
Describe what the customer can now do and which metric moves
Show who typically buys an add-on and when
Provide a one-screen calculator for capacity decisions
Inspiration: HubSpot ROI calculators
Examples
Collaboration SaaS. Three tiers by admin and security depth. Add-ons: advanced analytics, HIPAA pack, extra storage blocks. Outcome: clear entry path and multiple expansion levers.
AI help desk. Tiers include user seats and monthly inference credits. Add-ons: premium models, fine-tuning, white-glove support. Heavy accounts pre-buy inference blocks for predictable spend.
Data platform. Tiers align to governance and performance SLAs. Add-ons: private link, audit exports, dedicated compute. Enterprise bundles support and security to satisfy procurement.
Pitfalls to avoid
Too many add-ons. Decision fatigue hurts conversion. Curate the list.
Hiding essentials behind add-ons. Customers will view this as nickel and diming.
Mismatched upgrade economics. If Pro + add-on > Enterprise, buyers will stall.
Ambiguous limits. Publish allowances and overage math to avoid surprises.
No migration plan. Repackages happen. Grandfather cleanly and provide clear paths.
Implementation checklist
Tier “jobs” defined with outcomes, limits, support, and list price ranges
Add-on candidates pass the polarized or expensive test and are few in number
Clear rules for what is tiered, what is add-on, and what is usage-based
Visible allowances, overage rates, and pre-paid block pricing
Pricing page copy explains upgrade paths in one sentence each
Sales has a one-pager and a calculator for capacity and ROI
Migration and grandfathering policy documented before launch
Further reading
Packaging and value metrics: OpenView
Feature packaging and price architecture: Paddle/ProfitWell
Examples of tasteful add-ons: Notion AI, Figma Dev Mode
Reference plan layouts: Salesforce editions, Airtable plans
Tanso
© 2025 Tanso. All rights reserved.
Tanso
© 2025 Tanso. All rights reserved.
Tanso
© 2025 Tanso. All rights reserved.